Winter, Chewning & Geary, LLP new Green Bay office location

Winter, Chewning & Geary, LLP recently moved our Green Bay office location to accommodate new staff and the needs of our clients. Our new office is located on the west side of town at 2121 S. Oneida St. Suite B, Green Bay, WI 54304. This new location is very conveniently located roughly halfway between Lambeau Field and Bay Park Square mall.

The phone number for the Green Bay office is still (920) 544-9114. The fax number is (920) 544-0892.

Directions to the Green Bay office can be found here: Directions to Green Bay office.

New television commercials for Winter, Chewning & Geary, LLP

As folks in the Green Bay – Fox Cities media markets may have noticed, we’ve been airing new commercials throughout the past month.  This one is one of my favorites:

Winter, Chewning & Geary, LLP adding Oshkosh office

Winter, Chewning & Geary, LLP is pleased to announce the August 2, 2010 opening of its office in Oshkosh, WI.  The Oshkosh office will be located at 111 N. Main St, Suite 400, Oshkosh, WI 54901.  The office is located on the 4th floor of the U.S. Bank Building at the corner of Main and Pearl.  This is the same building where many of our clients have hearings.  The Social Security Administration’s remote hearing site in Oshkosh is on the 3rd floor.  In addition, this office is conveniently located one block from the Oshkosh Social Security office which is located in the City Center Complex o.  Appointments at the Oshkosh office will be by appointment only.  We hope that this will allow us to provide a greater level of service to our clients, not only in Winnebago County but also to clients from Outagamie, Waupaca, Waushara, Marquette, Green Lake, and Fond du Lac Counties.

Employees misclassified as independent contractors often denied SSDI

Today’s New York Times includes an article about the Obama administration’s effort to crack down on employers who improperly classify some employees as independent contractors.  These employees receive IRS Form 1099s rather than W2s.  The result is that the employer avoids having to make payroll tax contributions towards Social Security and Medicare, as well as having to avoid labor and worker’s compensation laws. 

I strongly support this crackdown because one of the often overlooked consequences of this is that these misclassified employees  – particularly low wage earners — are often uniformed and do not pay payroll taxes on their own.  When they don’t, they do not contribute to the Social Security trust fund and do not earn quarters of coverage.  If they have worked for a significant period of time as an independent contractor, they often lose (or never acquire) coverage under the Social Security disability program.  A person who may have considered themselves an employee for years may become disabled and discover that they are not eligible to draw from the benefit pool from which other properly-classified workers receive benefits.  Even if they still do qualify because of quarters of coverage earned at other jobs, their benefit amount is likely to be significantly reduced because of the lack of contributions during the period of employment as an independent contractor.  These misclassified employees are thus left to rely on the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program which has strict income and asset limitations and usually much smaller payments.

Happy New Year!

Fireworks by Anna Cervova

Recent Wisconsin newspaper coverage of backlog

Over the past few weeks there have been a couple newspaper articles written about the Wisconsin Social Security disability backlog.  On September 19, the Wisconsin State Journal ran an article with the headline, “People seeking Social Security benefits face huge backlog, long delays“.  The LaCrosse Tribune followed up with an article on September 20 with the headline “Wisconsin’s Social Security disability case backlog among worst in U.S.; new video conferencing expected to help in La Crosse.”  There isn’t much in the articles that isn’t known to folks who follow this blog, but it is interesting to see how the state press is handling the situation.

The Wisconsin State Journal also ran an article about the staffing situation at the Wisconsin Disability Determination Bureau indicating that employees at that state agency – which makes disability determinations at the initial and reconsideration levels – will be subject to mandatory furloughs due to the state budget shortfall. 

Don’t think the backlog problem or the bad press for SSA is limited to Wisconsin.  In the same week, The Detroit News ran this story about the situation in Michigan.

Social Security Booklet on Wisconsin Backlog of Hearing Cases

As I have discussed previously, when a claimant in Wisconsin requests a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge,  the wait for the hearing is over well over 18 months.  This long wait is one of the toughest things for my clients to deal with.  The Social Security Administration (SSA) has issued a report documenting the state of the backlog of hearing cases in Wisconsin.  This report is the second quarter update for fiscal year 2009.  It shows that the average processing time in Wisconsin is 618 days – more than 128 days longer than the national average.  To give an idea of the age of some cases pending in Wisconsin consider the following from the report:

We started FY 2009 with 3,322 Wisconsin cases that will be 850 days old or more by the end of the fiscal year. Through March, we cleared 57.80% of these cases.

The report has some interesting graphs showing the average waiting time over time.  It also shows how the current recession has resulted in an increase in the number of hearings requested.  The SSA hopes to have the backlog of cases eliminated by 2013.

No improvement in wait for hearings

According to the information published regularly in the NOSSCR Forum, there has been no improvement over the past nine months on disability case processing times at the Wisconsin or Madison hearing offices.  The figures in the June issue indicate that the processing time for Milwaukee is 679 days, whereas Madison is at 717 days.  In comparison, last November Milwaukee was at 575 days and Madison was at 719 days.    Meanwhile, cases in Northeast Wisconsin and the Fox Valley continue to be shipped out of state to the hearing offices in Oakland (591 days), Santa Barbara (561 days) and Pasadena (473 days), California.

Cost of medical records for disability claimants now limited to $26.00 per request

As I mentioned in a previous post, as part of the biennial budget bill, 2008 Wis. Act 28, the legislature has now set limits on the amounts that health care providers can charge for medical records.  Previously, these were set by administrative code section HFS 117.  The new law, which appears to have an effective date of June 30, 2009, creates a new statutory provision (Wis. Stat. § 146.83(1f)(4)) that limits the maximum amount that a health care provider can charge disability claimants appealing a denial of benefits to the amount that SSA reimburses the state DHFS for medical records.  I have been in contact with the folks at the State who order and pay for medical records in disability claims and have been informed that the reimbursement rate is $26.00 per records request.  The rate per page authorized by the new statory provision is $0.35.   Because it is typical for a representative to pass the cost of medical records onto the clients in these cases, this is a big change — one which could save claimants a good deal of money in their efforts to prove their disability claims.  

(Note: The limits on medical records will only apply to medical providers in Wisconsin.)

Initial claims in Wisconsin up 9% from 2008

According to the newest addition of the NOSSCR Forum through the 35th week of 2009, there have been 31,432 disability claims filed in Wisconsin.   In comparison, there were 28,831 claims filed during the same period last year.  The result is a 9% increase in initial disability claims.  The explanation for this is the current economic recession.  When you factor the economy in with the aging baby boomer population, I expect we will continue to see an increase in disability applications.